ReflectionOf.Me

of you and of everything that surrounds us... 

« Back to blog

Relative prices of different liquids

Posted by clementine 

Comments (76)

Dec 23, 2009
Markus Merz said...
The source for data and graph would be interesting.
Dec 23, 2009
Jono Hunt liked this post.
Dec 23, 2009
Napoleon liked this post.
Dec 24, 2009
Julian Edward liked this post.
Dec 24, 2009
emitremmus said...
I'm sure that HP ink will be alway at the top of the stage !!! :D
Dec 24, 2009
Emcee Hao said...
man that is messed up! ink costs more than penicillin??? just not right
Dec 24, 2009
Quan Hoang liked this post.
Dec 24, 2009
Emcee Hao liked this post.
Dec 24, 2009
mahendra said...
Interesting information..
Dec 24, 2009
Justin Baker liked this post.
Dec 24, 2009
Ross said...
These aren't relative prices.
Dec 24, 2009
Gary said...
Are all these except oil retail prices? Shouldn't the oil price be retail gasoline to be a proper comparison?
Dec 24, 2009
Jon said...
Calcium Hydroxylapatite, a fancy name for calcium phosphate found in bones and teeth. This material can be synthesized commercially. In this procedure, microspheres of this synthetic material suspended in polysaccharide is injected in the facial soft tissue. The calcium hydroxylapatite is resorbed by the body and replaced by fibrous tissue which adds volume and acts as a filler. This procedure is used to treat frown lines, crows’ feet, smile lines and to enhance the fullness of lips. This material is estimated to cost between $600 to $1,600 per milliliter. The commercial name of this product is Radiance
Dec 24, 2009
dhanya said...
and yet its the crude oil tat causes inflation!!
Dec 25, 2009
Ozan Sakin said...
We cannot even get to the level of HP ink even if we mix Human Blood with extreme amounts of VODKA! :D
Dec 26, 2009
reedster said...
Pepto Bismol, $0.96 per ounce = $0.033 per mL.
Dec 27, 2009
spuffler said...
Ok, lets skip the obvious intentions and instead curry the most outlandish counterarguments possible. As a FORMER inkjet user, I CLEARLY understood the point of this graph: Print 40-80 pages, spend $45 on a new inkjet cartridge (HP closed the refill market). That is why I bought a monochrome laser printer. Yeah, toner is 3 times the price of the inkjet cartridge, but I get 10-20 times the amount of printed pages. Cost effectiveness.
Dec 27, 2009
herr sexyhosen said...
ink is in higher demand and harder to manufacture than any of these.
Dec 28, 2009
Vera said...
Wow, that's crazy!
Dec 28, 2009
Maskil liked this post.
Dec 28, 2009
Vinicius Ferreira liked this post.
Dec 28, 2009
JAKERRIAN said...
UGLY
Dec 28, 2009
Ryan said...
Can we please see the sources for this?
Dec 29, 2009
martin Henner said...
I'm confused. I thought the ink price included fancy electronic circuitry in the cartridge. So the cost is not just the ink.
Dec 29, 2009
Ariadne Gomes liked this post.
Dec 29, 2009
Bud said...
I love when people are dumb enough to defend the price of ink cartridges. Ha!
Dec 29, 2009
Brian said...
I don't know if these are the sources used to make this graph, but I found very similar results. I just googled these prices and picked the top sites.

HP Ink #45: http://www.shopping.hp.com/product/C6650FN%2523140?landing=supplies&category=&family_name=
$63.99/84mL which equals $0.76/mL

Blood: Apparently Red Cross classifies ~500mL of blood as being worth $200, so that comes out to $0.40.

Penicillin: http://www.amazon.com/Long-Lasting-Penicillin-250ml/dp/B00061MQGY. $18.49/250mL which equals about $.07/mL

Vodka (I just picked Grey Goose): http://www.wallywine.com/p-15179-grey-goose-vodka-750ml.aspx. $34.99/750mL is about 4.6 cents/mL.

Red Bull: http://www.amazon.com/Red-Bull-Energy-Drink-8-4-Ounce/dp/B000MTST70. 24 8.4oz cans for $51.15. 201.6 fl oz is about 5962mL and with the math, it comes out to .85 cents/mL.

Water (Aquafina): http://www.cvcoffee.com/pd_aquafina.cfm. $17.99/480oz. Or, 14195 mL resulting in .126cents or $.00126/mL.

Crude Oil: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gas29-2009dec29,0,5101206.story. I just used $80/barrel and according to http://www.unitconversion.org/volume/milliliters-to-barrels-oil-conversion.html, 1 barrel is 158987mL. This results in $.000503/mL of crude oil.

In conclusion, two and a half cartridges for a barrel of crude?

Dec 30, 2009
MikeMinMD said...
Fun, but meaningless as it's an apples and oranges (and lemons and grapes ...) comparison. What is the relative price of black ink between the different manufacturers? Compare HP to Cannon to Lexmark, etc. to get a meaningful chart.
Dec 30, 2009
Murlu said...
The cost of ink is waaaaay to high seeing that most of it is manufactured at a very low cost. The main costs really comes from the cartridges but even those are fairly low.

Inkjets should really be half of what they are currently selling for.

Dec 30, 2009
foo said...
how about including the cost of other inks like pen and art ink?
Dec 30, 2009
xoco said...
cant believe ink is the most expensive
Dec 30, 2009
Shelton Koskie said...
This was originally posted on Gizmodo back in 2006. You might want to give them due credit... http://gizmodo.com/212444/hp-ink-costs-more-than-human-blood-booze
Dec 31, 2009
JoJo said...
DUDES,
HP inc is created from many substances that when taken apart would be cheaper then oil.
All the items cheaper then the inc are that way since they are basic liquids and not a finished product with many combined liquids in 1.

How much is dizel? And please do not forget that blood is subsidized.

Dec 31, 2009
Karl said...
Interesting.

Here's a question (and this may in part explain the higher cost of ink), how much oil is used in the production methods of all the other liquids? Crude oil is the only liquid that is a "resource", all the others are products. When you take into account the chemical sources, the processing, the power consumed during that process, the cost of transport of the raw materials and finished products, the packaging, the resources and power used to produce the equipment used in the processing, you will probably find that the HP ink (including the plastic and curcuitry in the cartridge) is the most intensive and costly to produce. Also, the processes involved probably consume more mLs of oil than mLs of ink that are produced. In other words, in the absence of proper measurements, logic would suggest that the ink would be the least efficient to produce (consuming the most resources in it's production) and therefore we should expect it to be the highest cost per mL.

Dec 31, 2009
Karl said...
Therefore, a small increase in the cost of crude oil will see a much bigger increase in the cost of the ink, because of all the oil consumed in every stage of the production and distribution process.

And there in lies the inflationary power of oil. It is used in the production of practically everything in modern life; either directly or indirectly.

Dec 31, 2009
meh said...
The only reason HP puts electronics in its ink carts is to make refilling and cloning them difficult to impossible.
Dec 31, 2009
evan orensky liked this post.
Jan 01, 2010
nice point sheldon, gizmodo is a great site.
Jan 01, 2010
EJW said...
@everyone asking for sources....if you cant seriously figure this out your self, then you should leave the difficult decisions, like which shoes goes on which foot, to others. You dont need a source. Stop being lazy and look it up. If a HP cartridge costs $17 then it'll be about $0.70 per ml. If a barrell of Oil costs around $80 right now...thats $.0005 per ml.

obviously people asking this cant dare think that oil company isn't the only company out there trying to make money. They realize if they learn that the oil companies have a far smaller profit margin...than say bottle water companies, they'd be seen for the douches they really are.

Jan 01, 2010
EJW said...
You want real data to back up my claims....

Exxon's profit margin for 2008 is 9.47%
Coca-Cola's for 2008 is double at 18.18%

here's the sources:
http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:XOM
http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:KO

Jan 01, 2010
RK said...
I am going to start printing in blood...(start printing in red instead of black)
Jan 02, 2010
Carlos said...
HP ink are very expensive in Taiwan. We seldomly hear HP's innovation, comparing with Apple, but HP is so big to be beated by no one. Pay it or go away! This is why their share-hoders own stock.
Jan 02, 2010
Vivek Mahadik said...
HP ink Cost > Bllood ............ Cant believe ...
Jan 04, 2010
ElGee said...
Missed Somavert 30mg, sold by Pfizer, 16,8$ / ml
Jan 04, 2010
Eric the Reddest said...
The only thing funnier than the graph are the pedants-from-hell commenting here.
Jan 05, 2010
Peter Lavelle said...
Ah - but human blood isn't subject to the rigorous methods of production used in HP ink(!) For the privilege of having my red claret looked over by trained scientists, I'd happily pay double.
Jan 06, 2010
yawning said...
@ EJW

"(...)people asking this cant dare think that oil company isn't the only company out there trying to make money. They realize if they learn that the oil companies have a far smaller profit margin...than say bottle water companies, they'd be seen for the douches they really are."

Is it?! Do oil companies have a far smaller profit margin?! No. Wrong! You completely missed the point! The thing is that oil companies buy very cheap oil and sell it (as gas) at very high prices!! So, the profit margin is huge. The price of oil (gas) to the regular consumer should be shown.

Pleazzzzse give credit to the original article (2006 http://gizmodo.com/212444/hp-ink-costs-more-than-human-blood-booze). If you're not the author the source maters, even if you can easily confirm the data!

Jan 07, 2010
James Hancox liked this post.
Jan 12, 2010
Twyloii said...
There's something missing from that graph; availability.
Jan 13, 2010
Thom_SoCal_HP said...
Hey all, HP employee here. This graph is interesting, but as MikeMinMD said, it’s an apples-to-oranges comparison. Our customers choose HP because of the quality and reliability of our products – a reputation we’ve earned with more than 20 years of developing highly technical printing innovations, in our hardware and in our ink.

Each time you hit print, microscopic droplets of ink are jetted by a superheated vapor bubble through hundreds of nozzles, about one-third the width of a human hair, at roughly 31 miles per hour and up to 36,000 times each second…per nozzle. Ink is also complex – it has to be chemically compatible with every part of the printer, cartridge and paper, and It can take up to 1,000 prototypes over three to five years to perfect a new ink formulation.

When you think about what you are getting out of each cartridge – photos of your family that will last generations or marketing materials that may land that next client – simply put, HP ink is worth it.

Jan 16, 2010
Clarence said...
Here's the source for this graph. A math teacher named Dan Meyer: http://blog.mrmeyer.com/?p=5633
Jan 16, 2010
Wow, that's crazy!
Jan 28, 2010
cysko liked this post.
Feb 11, 2010
LP said...
@Clarence - Gizmodo is the source, as indicated in other comments. Meyers post is newer than this one, jeez.
Apr 06, 2010
Israel Barros liked this post.
Apr 08, 2010
Jason said...
to the guy who said it was preposterous that penicillin was so cheap, perhaps you need to understand the mechanism by which penicillin is obtained in order to understand why in fact it is so inexpensive. why shouldn't medicines be cheap? especially the ones that basically make themselves.
Apr 21, 2010
OMG that HP ink cartridge is expensive!
May 23, 2010
Ethan said...
@Thom_SoCal_HP

We should add to the chart how much hp payed you per word to write that drivel.

May 30, 2010
Mamoon Khader said...
Not just HP inks are expensive but ALL original inks from different manufacturers are way over-prices .
Jun 12, 2010
IGNOU MCA said...
The ink business perhaps brings more for HP then their printers. I always go for refills inspite of the relatively poor quality
Jul 23, 2010
Din Freebies said...
Therefore, a small increase in the cost of crude oil will see a much bigger increase in the cost of the ink, because of all the oil consumed in every stage of the production and distribution process.

And there in lies the inflationary power of oil. It is used in the production of practically everything in modern life; either directly or indirectly.

Aug 08, 2010
Erick said...
Hey all, HP employee here. This graph is interesting, but as MikeMinMD said, it’s an apples-to-oranges comparison.
HP ink are very expensive in Taiwan. We seldomly hear HP's innovation, comparing with Apple, but HP is so big to be beated by no one. Pay it or go away! This is why their share-hoders own stock.
Aug 20, 2010
Clair Cote said...
This graph is very interesting. Thank you for your share.
mesothelioma treatment options
Oct 15, 2010
Kamagra said...
Ever since I have been deeply interested on this kind of affairs, I just wanted to thank you for sharing with all us this such a piece of masterpiece of work. In short, I think you are damn good at this.
Dec 01, 2010
CdnContent said...
Thom_SoCal_HP, such a canned response.. but I hope you don't really buy that baloney. The technology is paid for by the price of the hardware, not the ink. Do you think Intel charges you more for each flop your CPU performs? Completely bollocks!

Human blood, you know, the stuff that actually sustains life is worth far more yet HP, Canon, Brother, etc don't believe so. One should realize that since it's World AIDS Day and healthy human blood should be the most expensive commodity.

Either way, HP printers were the best at some point; they lost that title over a decade ago when technology moved forward.

Dec 01, 2010
CdnContent said...
>> Peter Lavelle: Ah - but human blood isn't subject to the rigorous methods of production used in HP ink(!)

I hope you weren't being sarcastic.

It costs the blood industry in the US and the industries in more civilized countries like Germany, the UK, France, most of the EU and Canada much more (tens of millions more) to test blood donors for diseases such as Hepatitis variants and HIV than it does for HP to develop ink!

Dec 23, 2010
The place for spirited political dialogue. Folks of all political stripes welcome.
Jan 15, 2011
Pot said...
Wahaha, yes, my blood aint worth ink
Feb 19, 2011
Is that chart made with MS Office?
Feb 19, 2011
It seems like, or is it Access?
Feb 20, 2011
kamagra1 said...
HP ink LOL XD
Mar 03, 2011
cialis said...
This is and has been tribal, unerring,­factious battles. To over this is over and beyond is not to have in the offing grasped why it started. That\'s what Approximate Schwarzkop­f had stated late in Comeuppance Disorder around one of the sensible on not current in to Baghdad along with the mandate. In low-down thats what Dick Cheney said when interviewe­d during Des. Strm.
May 01, 2011
Jim West said...
website about recycling to save the environment. Manufacturers want you to return empty cartridges to them - why? They do not want end users to re-use these. What do they do with empty cartridges - Refill them - No - their idea of "recycling" is to send them to a third world Country to be split up into metal and plastic. Where are their Green Credentials?
What is the real carbon footprint involved in this?
May 05, 2011
Jim is right this website is about cycling, where ARE the green credentials?
Aug 30, 2011
Lesbian bondage said...
Hey all, HP employee here. This graph is interesting, but as MikeMinMD said, it’s an apples-to-oranges comparison.
HP ink are very expensive in Taiwan. We seldomly hear HP's innovation, comparing with Apple, but HP is so big to be beated by no one. Pay it or go away! This is why their share-hoders own stock.
Apr 25, 2012
joanmc33 said...
These aren't relative prices.

>> newegg promo code <<

Leave a comment...